San Bernardino Criminal Defense Attorney
Over 20 Years Experience
San Bernardino Criminal Defense Lawyer Attorney Profile Frequently Asked Questions Case Results Testimonials Contact a criminal defense attorney
Criminal Defense Areas of Practice
Child Molestation
DMV
Domestic Violence
Drug Offenses
Drug Possession
DUI and Vehicular Manslaughter
Expungements
Federal Crimes
Felonies
Firearm/ Weapons Charges
Homicide
Identity Theft
Juvenile Crimes
Marsy's Law
Medical Marijuana Cases
Misdemeanors
Motions
Other Sex Offenses
Probation & Parole
Rape
Riverside
San Bernardino
Securities Violations
Theft Crimes
Three Strikes
White Collar Crimes
Writs & Appeals
Contact a criminal defense lawyer
Click here to view our criminal defense blog
View our deals on cases here
155 West Hospitality Lane, San Bernardino, CA 92408
Click here to connect to our office instantly Click here to fill our a free case evaluation form

California Governor Allows Warrantless Searching of Cell Phones

Here's another reason to password-protect your mobile phone: Governor Brown just recently vetoed a bill that requires a court-ordered warrant in order to search mobile phones upon arrest. This means that if you get arrested in the state of California, the arresting officer can search your smartphone — which gives him access to emails, call logs, texts, location data, banking apps, and more — without needing a warrant.

Governor Jerry Brown says the issue is too complicated for him to make a decision about and has upheld the supreme court's recent decision in People v. Diaz on warrentless searches that include mobile phones.

This January in People v. Diaz, the Supreme Court of California affirmed the Court of Appeals decision that a warrantless search of the text message folder on an arrested person’s phone was valid as incident to a lawful custodial arrest. The facts of this case are as follows: Diaz was arrested after selling Ecstasy to a police informant posing as a drug purchaser. Upon arrest, Diaz’s cell phone was seized and placed into evidence. After Diaz was interviewed in custody, Senior Deputy Sheriff Victor Fazio looked through Diaz’s cell phone text messages and found a text detailing a sale of Ecstasy. Diaz was charged with selling a controlled substance. Diaz pleaded not guilty and moved to quash the information gained from the search of his text messages, alleging such a warrantless search of his cell phone violated the Fourth Amendment. The trial court denied the motion, reasoning the search was incident to the arrest. The Supreme Court of California affirmed. The primary issue was whether a cell phone is considered property incidental to a person and therefore searchable without a warrant or instead a pathway to personal data which consequently necessitates greater Fourth Amendment protection.

Password-protecting your smartphone isn't just a good idea in everyday practice, but it will also require an arresting officer to obtain a warrant in order for you to hand over the password.